Disregard, I miss read this.
Nick Chalko wrote:
Michael Davey wrote:
I'd suggest that the change to "project" be a mandate. The change
could be considered a clarification to improve consistency in
naming. The alternative would be to let, say, Commons Net define
their project as "commons-net" while Commons IO may choose to call
their project simply "io".
On problem is the word project is very overloaded. At apache Jakarta
is a Project. a TLP but still a project. By using the term product,
we are specifying that is a THING that we are shipping, to us,
(the repo list) a product, is a thing that is "versioned" and
So I am -0 on using the word project.