Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> If you want to pull in, say, plone.supermodel (a "pure Zope 3" package 
>> that should be re-usable and may be useful to BFG if it ever wants to 
>> serialise Zope 3 schema interfaces to/from an XML representation) well, 
>> it uses zope:* ZCML directives. Are you going to fork plone.supermodel? 
> I would be very tempted at least. Or decide to not use supermodel.

Which would mean that the BFG-intersecting parts of the repoze stack 
would be a fork or re-implementation of all Zope stuff that was 
interesting to it. I don't think that's a sustainable way forward. Or at 
least, then repoze should stop billing itself as "the maturity of Zope 
now with the flexibility of the WSGI future".

But I don't think that's what Paul or Chris would want. :)


Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to