I haven't received enough replies to be able to say. Having you test this would really help.
Would you be willing to make a backup of your database, then install the Django Evolution package from http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/? You'd need to attempt the upgrade again and then test out the site a bit, make sure nothing is broken (including commenting on file attachments). Christian -- Christian Hammond - [email protected] Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mar 9, 2013, at 2:37 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > was this experiment successful ? > Like some others, I took a snapshot of a working 1.5.5 installation from > Centos 5.5, copied it to a Centos 6.3 machine, and upgraded to 1.6.15, then > to 1.7.6. > That all took 2 months, due to various issues and lack of focus. Today I took > another snapshot of my working 1.5.5 installation, and tried to apply that. I > dropped the working but out-of-date reviewboard table in the 1.7.6 > installation, then restored the current .sql file from the 1.5.5 release; > then did > "/usr/bin/python" "/usr/bin/rb-site" upgrade "/var/www/reviewboard". That > produced a site which just sayd 'Something broke." The output from the > upgrade command is: > Error: Model 'reviews.FileAttachmentComment' already has a field named > 'extra_data' > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > > The log output below, including warnings and errors, > can be ignored unless upgrade fails. > > ------------------ <begin log output> ------------------ > Creating tables ... > Creating table extensions_registeredextension > Creating table accounts_localsiteprofile > Creating table attachments_fileattachment > Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata > Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount > Creating table reviews_fileattachmentcomment > Creating table site_localsite_users > Creating table site_localsite_admins > Creating table site_localsite > Upgrading Review Board from 1.5.5 to 1.7.6 > There are unapplied evolutions for auth. > There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. > There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. > There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. > Adding baseline version for new models > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > Installing custom SQL ... > Installing indexes ... > Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) > Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM > (reviewboard.scmtools.plastic.PlasticTool) in database > > I expect I'm doing something fundamentally wrong, but this seems to be a > common usage model, so perhaps someone can steer me straight ? > Thanks, > > > > On Friday, March 1, 2013 9:58:34 AM UTC-8, Steve wrote: > I can also test it on my sandbox which is currently in this state. > > --steve > > > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:05:31 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi again, > > I actually think I may have a fix for Django Evolution, but I will need > volunteers to test. I'll be sending out an e-mail with instructions shortly. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - [email protected] > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > On Feb 26, 2013, at 9:00 PM, Nachiketh G <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Sebastien/Christian, >> I tried the upgrading from a 1.0 release of RB to 1.7.x and ran into the >> exact same error when I did a "rb-site upgrade". >> Error: Model 'reviews.FileAttachmentComment' already has a field named >> 'extra_data' >> >> Were you guys able to find a solution to this problem? Do let me know. >> Thanks & Regards, >> Nachiketh >> >> >> On Thursday, 27 December 2012 20:45:22 UTC+5:30, Sébastien Douche wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to upgrade RB to the last version: >> >> rd1:~/ReviewBoard-1.7.1# rb-site upgrade /srv/reviewboard >> Rebuilding directory structure >> Updating database. This may take a while. >> >> The log output below, including warnings and errors, >> can be ignored unless upgrade fails. >> >> ------------------ <begin log output> ------------------ >> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.7-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26: >> >> DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead >> from md5 import md5 >> Creating tables ... >> Creating table extensions_registeredextension >> Creating table accounts_localsiteprofile >> Creating table attachments_fileattachment >> Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata >> Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount >> Creating table reviews_fileattachmentcomment >> Creating table site_localsite_users >> Creating table site_localsite_admins >> Creating table site_localsite >> Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 to 1.7.1 >> There are unapplied evolutions for auth. >> There are unapplied evolutions for sessions. >> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. >> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. >> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. >> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. >> There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. >> Adding baseline version for new models >> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required >> Installing custom SQL ... >> Installing indexes ... >> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) >> Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM >> (reviewboard.scmtools.plastic.PlasticTool) in database >> Error: Model 'reviews.FileAttachmentComment' already has a field named >> 'extra_data' >> >> On IHM: >> >> DatabaseError at /dashboard/ >> (1054, "Unknown column 'accounts_profile.is_private' in 'field list'") >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastien Douche <[email protected]> >> Twitter: @sdouche / G+: +sdouche >> >> -- >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
