We made a number of improvements to the Mercurial support in RBTools 0.6. I don't have personal experience with hg subversion myself, so I don't know whether it's still at all necessary for any workflows. Certainly, we'd rather time be spent updating RBTools for any missing functionality.
Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Bruce Cran <bruce.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm investigating upgrading our installation to Review Board 2.x and one > issue I've come across is that with the existing code, "hg postreview" > doesn't work correctly. I've submitted a ticket to > https://bitbucket.org/ccaughie/hgreviewboard, but I was wondering - are > people still planning to use the hg postreview extension, or are you all > switching to the rbt client? > > -- > Bruce > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
