Hi Bruce,

Most of the developers at my company are still using postreview with RB 
2.0. We've always seen the error you reported in the bug, both with and 
without postreview. It seems to be a reviewboard issue. As a workaround, 
you might be able to make your parent diff include more changesets. The 
trick is that all of the changed files in your diff must be referenced in 
the parent diff as well. Hope that helps.


On Monday, June 2, 2014 1:22:09 PM UTC-5, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I'm investigating upgrading our installation to Review Board 2.x and one 
> issue I've come across is that with the existing code, "hg postreview" 
> doesn't work correctly. I've submitted a ticket to 
> https://bitbucket.org/ccaughie/hgreviewboard 
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbitbucket.org%2Fccaughie%2Fhgreviewboard&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNE34g4wW_nHHVDDE-wLzYYOHMTp6w>,
> but I was wondering - are people still planning to use the hg postreview 
> extension, or are you all switching to the rbt client?
> --  
> Bruce 

Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to