Anyone? On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 10:08:12 AM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > > Bump? > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:33:43 PM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hello to both, >> >> I'm currently giving this a try as we'd really like to get it to connect. >> But both options are currently failing for the following reasons: >> * - hosting backend:* >> >> Despite the name suggesting something along those lines, the API is >> actually not at all compatible. (diffs are JSON objects and other silly >> unexpected things) >> >> So this is not a simple copy and paste and would someone who isn't as >> knowledgable in python (me) quite some time to complete. >> >> * - SCMTool API:* >> >> This initially seemed like it would be easier than the bitbucket server >> approach as bitbucket already uses it. But I can't seem to get the commit >> ID to be passed to the eventual function. >> >> For reference: >> https://github.com/SMillerDev/reviewboard/commit/160628d3589173142b69f106bb2a2e54c5ca6766 >> >> >> If you have any insights on the best way to proceed, I'd be happy to hear >> them. >> >> Regards, >> Sean Molenaar >> >> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 11:33:56 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Heinz, >>> >>> The proper solution would be to implement a hosting service backend for >>> this, or augment the existing one if the API is at all compatible. >>> >>> It should be possible to extend the raw file URL stuff to take in a >>> commit ID, optionally, but it's a lot more work, as it impacts the SCMTool >>> API. Currently, only hosting services have any support for base_commit_id. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Hammond >>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Heinz Wiesinger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:30:10 Heinz Wiesinger wrote: >>>> > Hi! >>>> > >>>> > We're currently evaluating bitbucket server (formerly stash, not to be >>>> > confused with the bitbucket cloud hosting) and are having troubles >>>> coming up >>>> > with a usable raw file URL mask. What we found so far is this: >>>> > >>>> > http://www.example.org/projects/KEY/repos/foo/browse/ >>>> <filename>?at=<revision >>>> > >&raw >>>> > >>>> > This works (with basic http authentication), but doesn't find the file >>>> > because it expects <revision> to be a commit hash, not an object >>>> hash. As >>>> > far as I can see at the moment Bitbucket server doesn't seem to have >>>> a way >>>> > to retrieve files by object hash. >>>> > >>>> > Does anyone else have experience with Bitbucket server / Stash? Or is >>>> there >>>> > a way to tell reviewboard to use commit hashes instead of object >>>> hashes? >>>> >>>> I came back to this after a while to try again, but no dice. Even >>>> looked at >>>> the code to see how easy it would be to add support for base_commit_id >>>> to >>>> custom hosting repositories, but something seems to escape me. >>>> >>>> I filed a feature request for now >>>> (https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4195/). Like I mentioned >>>> there as >>>> well, I'm more than happy to supply a patch for this myself, if someone >>>> can >>>> help me figure out what needs to be adapted :) >>>> >>>> Grs, >>>> Heinz >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>>
-- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
