Anyone?

On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 10:08:12 AM UTC+2, se...@m2mobi.com wrote:
>
> Bump?
>
> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:33:43 PM UTC+2, se...@m2mobi.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello to both,
>>
>> I'm currently giving this a try as we'd really like to get it to connect. 
>> But both options are currently failing for the following reasons:
>> * - hosting backend:*
>>
>> Despite the name suggesting something along those lines, the API is 
>> actually not at all compatible. (diffs are JSON objects and other silly 
>> unexpected things)
>>
>> So this is not a simple copy and paste and would someone who isn't as 
>> knowledgable in python (me) quite some time to complete.
>>
>> * -  SCMTool API:*
>>
>> This initially seemed like it would be easier than the bitbucket server 
>> approach as bitbucket already uses it. But I can't seem to get the commit 
>> ID to be passed to the eventual function.
>>
>>  For reference: 
>> https://github.com/SMillerDev/reviewboard/commit/160628d3589173142b69f106bb2a2e54c5ca6766
>>
>>
>> If you have any insights on the best way to proceed, I'd be happy to hear 
>> them.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sean Molenaar 
>>
>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 11:33:56 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Heinz,
>>>
>>> The proper solution would be to implement a hosting service backend for 
>>> this, or augment the existing one if the API is at all compatible.
>>>
>>> It should be possible to extend the raw file URL stuff to take in a 
>>> commit ID, optionally, but it's a lot more work, as it impacts the SCMTool 
>>> API. Currently, only hosting services have any support for base_commit_id.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Heinz Wiesinger <hmwie...@liwjatan.at> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:30:10 Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
>>>> > Hi!
>>>> >
>>>> > We're currently evaluating bitbucket server (formerly stash, not to be
>>>> > confused with the bitbucket cloud hosting) and are having troubles 
>>>> coming up
>>>> > with a usable raw file URL mask. What we found so far is this:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.example.org/projects/KEY/repos/foo/browse/
>>>> <filename>?at=<revision
>>>> > >&raw
>>>> >
>>>> > This works (with basic http authentication), but doesn't find the file
>>>> > because it expects <revision> to be a commit hash, not an object 
>>>> hash. As
>>>> > far as I can see at the moment Bitbucket server doesn't seem to have 
>>>> a way
>>>> > to retrieve files by object hash.
>>>> >
>>>> > Does anyone else have experience with Bitbucket server / Stash? Or is 
>>>> there
>>>> > a way to tell reviewboard to use commit hashes instead of object 
>>>> hashes?
>>>>
>>>> I came back to this after a while to try again, but no dice. Even 
>>>> looked at
>>>> the code to see how easy it would be to add support for base_commit_id 
>>>> to
>>>> custom hosting repositories, but something seems to escape me.
>>>>
>>>> I filed a feature request for now
>>>> (https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4195/). Like I mentioned 
>>>> there as
>>>> well, I'm more than happy to supply a patch for this myself, if someone 
>>>> can
>>>> help me figure out what needs to be adapted :)
>>>>
>>>> Grs,
>>>> Heinz
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to