----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/#review76853 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_supdate.py <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/#comment124531> This is more of a general concern, but it would be nice to avoid adding new tests in this style - and instead test the Command instance directly. I can't find the actual back and forth that led me to testing like this, but it was introduced here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27848/diff/# - David McLaughlin On March 17, 2015, 11:54 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 17, 2015, 11:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji. > > > Bugs: AURORA-1168 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1168 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > NOTE: I also am proposing with this change that the output format of `aurora > update list` be line-oriented and more concise (see test changes for > examples). The idea is to follow up ~immediately with AURORA-1206. The > proposal is for this command to let you retrieve update identifiers, and > `update status` (whose name may change) will allow you to drill into updates. > > I'm open to input on this. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/update.py > f025d46d50592156e2455313890e981722ab63a5 > src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_supdate.py > cb66439a778349fc5add4985a7395655c9e1328a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32171/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Bill Farner > >
