Daniel Becker has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21726 )

Change subject: IMPALA-13330: Fix orc_schema_resolution in test_nested_types.py
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(4 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21726/1/tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py
File tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21726/1/tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py@133
PS1, Line 133:     add_exec_option_dimension(cls, 'mt_dop', MT_DOP_DIMS)
Can't MT_DOP and ORC_RESOLUTION_DIM be added to the dict in the call to 
create_exec_option_dimension_from_dict()?
See also L189 and L222.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21726/1/tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py@404
PS1, Line 404:   def test_map_null_keys(self, vector):
This test now doesn't have the exec options it used to, set on L182: 
disable_codegen, disable_codegen_rows_threshold and 
exec_single_node_rows_threshold.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21726/1/tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py@446
PS1, Line 446: ORC
Shouldn't it be Parquet?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21726/1/tests/query_test/test_nested_types.py@455
PS1, Line 455:     add_exec_option_dimension(cls, 'orc_schema_resolution', 
ORC_RESOLUTION_DIMS)
Do we need this and the 'orc_schema_resolution_constraint' if it is only run 
with Parquet?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21726
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib958cd34a56c949190b4f22e5da5dad2c0de25ff
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21726
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Becker <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Gabor Kaszab <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:13:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to