Dan Burkert has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10097 )

Change subject: KUDU-2365: [Java] Fix Gradle Artifacts
......................................................................


Patch Set 5:

(3 comments)

Only got 1/2 way through this and need to go to meeting, but wanted to put up 
what I have.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10097/1/java/gradle.properties
File java/gradle.properties:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10097/1/java/gradle.properties@25
PS1, Line 25: mavenUrl = 
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2
Why are scmUrl and issueTrackerUrl removed?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10097/5/java/gradle.properties
File java/gradle.properties:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10097/5/java/gradle.properties@25
PS5, Line 25: mavenUrl = 
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2
I think it'd be better to call this something like 'publishUrl' or 
'mavenPublishUrl' to make it clear that this URL is being fed into 
publishing.gradle, and isn't used for any other kind of dependency resolution 
(where it wouldn't be appropriate to use a staging repo).


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/10097/5/java/gradle.properties@41
PS5, Line 41: signing.gnupg.executable = gpg
Do we expect these properties to ever be modified?  If not, it may be a bit 
more streamlined to put them in publishing.gradle to keep them close to where 
they are used.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/10097
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaef485eca7eebe55286ad5670452839bebb0c47e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 10097
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Grant Henke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:57:37 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to