----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40375/#review107529 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/common/resources.cpp (lines 94 - 106) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40375/#comment166742> For compatibility issue, shall we take no_type same as USAGE_SLACK? - Guangya Liu On 十一月 21, 2015, 3:47 a.m., Klaus Ma wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/40375/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 十一月 21, 2015, 3:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Artem Harutyunyan, and Joris Van > Remoortere. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3888 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3888 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > MESOS-3888: We need to distinguish revocable resource for usage slack and > allocation slack. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 5ad48bd > include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto e71ddda > src/common/resources.cpp f1da323 > src/tests/resources_tests.cpp 0d084fd > src/v1/resources.cpp 6f50101 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40375/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make && make check > > > Thanks, > > Klaus Ma > >
