> On Dec. 11, 2015, 6:42 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/puller.cpp, line 96
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41235/diff/1/?file=1159660#file1159660line96>
> >
> >     Wondering why we removed error context like the name of the file. 
> > Wouldnt that be great debugging information?

Because the caller is responsible for logging the name of the file. This is a 
common protocol we use: if the caller has the information, always relying on 
caller to log that information to avoid double logging of that information.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41235/#review109981
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 11, 2015, 1:35 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41235/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 11, 2015, 1:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Gilbert Song, Jojy Varghese, and 
> Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Cleaned up the untar method in docker puller.
> 
> The extra promise is not needed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/puller.cpp 
> 4aa4a9c4074d96c30c3bceea59d071feeecae2ea 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41235/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to