-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/#review123205
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/contenders/zookeeper.cpp (lines 27 - 33)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/#comment185423>

    Do you really need these new includes?


- Joseph Wu


On March 10, 2016, 3:46 p.m., Anurag Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 10, 2016, 3:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4610
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4610
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added support for contender and detector modules.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/module/contender.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   include/mesos/module/detector.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/Makefile.am a41e95ddeb838fdebf4ced953c4a29181916e261 
>   src/examples/test_contender_module.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/examples/test_detector_module.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/local/local.cpp 359fc54d7c4081f536a8de8b1dfcde413d75c9a9 
>   src/master/contenders/zookeeper.cpp 
> 9ad49ce10439fb41d78d52eaa4c1e6b9c5c7f735 
>   src/master/detectors/zookeeper.cpp 9274435802d6292b183be48f42b43999476e016e 
>   src/module/manager.cpp 6ae99504005581b22a44768949b1d305cec517d9 
>   src/tests/module.hpp 4b32f29f2ce76100433621a5cb6b8cc87c9b38f8 
>   src/tests/module.cpp 8cc305c0ef606b07eea39d548d3165a2bb2b042a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> In addition to all unit tests passing, we are currently using this 
> functionality in our environment with a custom consensus stack. In our world, 
> we have a C++ plugin that calls out to an HTTP REST service (implemented in 
> Java/Scala, not that it matters).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anurag Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to