----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#review149324 -----------------------------------------------------------
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/posix/subprocess.hpp (line 214) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#comment216892> s/std::vector/vector/ 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/posix/subprocess.hpp (line 312) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#comment216890> Ditto. 3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp (line 132) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/#comment216891> Ditto. - Qian Zhang On Sept. 12, 2016, 4:17 a.m., Joerg Schad wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 12, 2016, 4:17 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Jie Yu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-5070 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5070 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Previously the subprocess interface supported a several options for the > child process such as setsid. In order to make the interface more > flexible we refactored such options into a vector of ChildHooks. > In order not to allow arbitrary code inside a ChildHook it has to be > constructed via pre-defined factory methods. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/posix/subprocess.hpp > 57f71d15e6fbb032c8b6c5d0c73a93751022e7e7 > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/gtest.hpp > 2ad623a5ea3b3286983e895010af756f14f51b64 > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess_base.hpp > acd23c99162f164c02a7781abeb95b3c220ead12 > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp > 8ca61f77083ac4b77aa1aec22806e1be43dbfa6c > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp > 0ff3945d2c722ebc1529265427397c5dfba6854e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45491/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested entire chain see https://reviews.apache.org/r/45492. > > > Thanks, > > Joerg Schad > >