Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896#discussion_r62064335
  
    --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala 
---
    @@ -71,6 +71,22 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends 
Params with HasPredictionCo
     
       /** @group getParam */
       def getItemCol: String = $(itemCol)
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Param for strategy for dealing with unknown users or items at 
prediction time.
    +   * Supported values:
    +   * - "nan": prediction value for unknown ids will be NaN.
    +   * - "drop": rows in the input DataFrame containing unknown ids will be 
dropped.
    +   * Default: "nan".
    +   * @group expertParam
    +   */
    +  val unknownStrategy = new Param[String](this, "unknownStrategy",
    --- End diff --
    
    Fair enough - I was trying to keep it brief. But it could be more clear.
    How about "unknownIdPredictionStrategy"?
    On Wed, 4 May 2016 at 17:23, Seth Hendrickson <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    
    > In mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
    > <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896#discussion_r62059332>:
    >
    > > @@ -71,6 +71,22 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends 
Params with HasPredictionCo
    > >
    > >    /** @group getParam */
    > >    def getItemCol: String = $(itemCol)
    > > +
    > > +  /**
    > > +   * Param for strategy for dealing with unknown users or items at 
prediction time.
    > > +   * Supported values:
    > > +   * - "nan": prediction value for unknown ids will be NaN.
    > > +   * - "drop": rows in the input DataFrame containing unknown ids will 
be dropped.
    > > +   * Default: "nan".
    > > +   * @group expertParam
    > > +   */
    > > +  val unknownStrategy = new Param[String](this, "unknownStrategy",
    >
    > I don't like the name "unknownStrategy" - seems very ambiguous. I'm not
    > sure what is best, but for example I think "unknownPredictionStrategy" or
    > "newUserItemPredictionStrategy" are better. Just something that will be
    > obvious what it is by the name.
    >
    > —
    > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
    > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
    > 
<https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896/files/fc437451a598221f0878b7a2e0b87d17572019cc#r62059332>
    >



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to