[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've yet to get hear a
reasonable justification for whats wrong with wanting clean and small
without a kickstart.

Seems there's been considerable agreement for the need for a 'clean and small' starting point. But kickstart lets you provide some initial configuration, and to add just the packages that you'll need for a useful machine (isdn, httpd, whatever...). Maybe what you have in mind is more like an 'appliance'? You might have a look at:
<http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2008/downloads/pdf/Bryan_Kearney_Building_Appliances_with_the_RH_Appliance_OS.pdf>
but even that involves kickstart.

-Ed

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to