I am waiting for the confusion when we have to understand when a user says they have a 6.1 system and we have to guess between RH6.1(ES) and RHEL6.1 =) I'm kind of hoping that they start off RHEL6 at 6.9 and work backwards!!
Bill Watson -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sharpe, Sam J Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 2:23 PM To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] why avahi? Ed Brown wrote: > Sharpe, Sam J wrote: >> Real Men (tm) configure in %post and never have to touch it again. > > Real Men (tm) tend to cry like babies, when an update re-installs and > enables the software removed in %post, and they don't have a > configuration management tool to fix the problem everywhere and make > sure it stays fixed! ;-) Real Men (tm) don't update =o) (Seriously... we fixed a lot of our systems (behind a firewall, very restricted access) at 4.4 and our update method now is to reinstall them completely with 5.X - data is all on SAN volumes) ((Don't even get me started on the RHEL 3.6 hosts)) Does anyone else have to live in a "if it works, don't update it" world, or is it just me? -- Sam _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
