dic = Dictionary[of string, Converter[of string, string]]()dic.Add('foo',
myObj)component Bar: ___map = dic On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Grimace of Despair < [email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, now I remember again why I'm using parameters... > > My map declaration on my component class looks like: > > public Dictionary<string, Converter<string, string>> Map > > > Now, using: > > bar = someVariableOrCallable > component MyObject: > Map = {"foo": bar} > > > Yields "Object of type 'Boo.Lang.Hash' cannot be converted to type > 'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2 > [System.String,System.Converter`2[System.String,System.String]]'" > > > So I started to use the KeyMapBuilder for this, bumping into the > aforementioned problems. > > > On Apr 23, 4:21 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Grimace of Despair < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've actually got a kind of deamon which loads Binsor applications > > > like aspnet_wp would load ASP.NET applications (though not nearly as > > > advanced). This setup allows me writing (copmiled) class libraries > > > that do the nitpicking, while being able to throw them around within > > > different configuration settings. Just to say that the running code is > > > actually container-agnostic, and stuff like custom dependencies would > > > have to be taken care of by my daemon. > > > > Sounds nifty > > > > > > > > > Now for the custom dependencies: I guess that can't be done in Binsor, > > > or am I missing something? > > > > You can, something like this > > > > component x: > > ____Map = { 'foo': MyObject() } > > > > This cuts out the whole conversion thing which is totally not needed in > > Binsor world > > > > > > > > > On Apr 23, 2:49 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Not sure if this helps, but the parameters and configuration sections > in > > > > binsor are used to expose the corresponding configuration model > supported > > > in > > > > MK. I don't believe custom conversions are handled for the values. > > > > However, when using Binsor, I generally only use those sections for > > > > Facility configurations that are already based on configuration. > > > Otherwise, > > > > I just set the dependencies directly. These could be anything and > just > > > get > > > > added to the custom dependencies collection and bound directly at > > > resolution > > > > time > > > > craig > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Grimace of Despair < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The following string to string mapping works fine for me: > > > > > > > component x: > > > > > _parameters: > > > > > __Map: > > > > > ___map(keymap) = { > > > > > ____"foo": "bar" > > > > > ___} > > > > > > > A string to component map also does: > > > > > > > component bar > > > > > component x: > > > > > _parameters: > > > > > __Map: > > > > > ___map(keymap) = { > > > > > ____"foo": @bar > > > > > ___} > > > > > > > Now I'm trying to pass in a custom, non-primitive object: > > > > > component x: > > > > > _parameters: > > > > > __Map: > > > > > ___map(keymap) = { > > > > > ____"foo": MyObject() > > > > > ___} > > > > > > > This fails with: > > > > > > > Castle.MicroKernel.SubSystems.Conversion.ConverterException: No > > > > > converter registered to handle the type MyObject. > > > > > > > I've done a little digging, and there are two remarks I have: > > > > > > > 1. KeyMapBuilder relies on > ConfigurationHelper.SetConfigurationValue, > > > > > which converts MyObject to a string, losing any reference to the > > > > > actual object. Most probably, there's a really logical explanation > for > > > > > this scenario, but to me, it seems that the map gets severely > limited > > > > > by the use of the said SetConfigurationValue. > > > > > > > 2. Even if the value was not converted to a string, the > > > > > GenericDictionaryConverter might not be able to use the original > > > > > value, because it does a PerformConversion. Afaics (but I might be > > > > > wrong), this method won't handle the conversion because no > converter > > > > > exist, while the value would already be of the correct type. > > > > > > > Could it be that I'm trying to push things? I can imagine the > > > > > ConfigurationHelper uses string conversions for a reason, but the > > > > > inability to use custom objects in the map ... well... it sucks :) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
