If you and Oren aren't using RS anymore, what are you using/suggest? On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library? > That doesn't sound right. It should certainly work with NH3 criteria > if you recompile using NH3 dependency though. > > Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects. The same > is true of me. Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and > simply accept commits that fix issues. If you want to actively > develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you. > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use > > criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1. And as such the > > RS can be used fully in with NH3. > > It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it > > certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses > > strings, but it is not necessary. Furthermore, I don't believe you > > can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria > > stuff. It's a tough call. > > I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the > > queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it. But > > unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I > > don't see how. > > R > > > > On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hrumph. > >> that sucks. > >> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered. > >> so > >> 1) what is Oren doing? I presume he's still using it and I presume > >> he's using NH3 > >> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/ > >> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead > >> return an IQueryOver<T,T>. This I believe would be the private > >> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but > >> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>. > >> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more? > >> Thanks, > >> Raif > >> > >> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > So I guess my questions are > >> > > 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq? > >> > >> > No > >> > >> > > 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria? > >> > >> > No > >> > >> > > 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to use > >> > > NH3. > >> > >> > Needs to be refacoted to use NH3. It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000 > >> > >> > > 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will > >> > > that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge > >> > > undertaking. > >> > >> > If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much > >> > welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage. > >> > It will not be trivial > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
