So are you using EF by choice? And are you able to achieve field level security with EF?
Sent from my iPhone On May 16, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: > Since I'm using EF in new .NET projects, I've just rolled my own. > > For the projects I am maintaining that use RS, it has worked fine and > I am sure will continue to work fine for the lifetime of these > products. Some people have reported problems with RS performance for > very large userbases with lots of operations. > > RS is a mature project that works well for what it does. > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> First, sorry, I am recompiling with NH3 I was just under the >> impression that NH3 had removed ICriteria in favor of QueryOver but >> that is not the case. >> Second, Thank you for the offer but I don't think I would be a good >> manager for RS as I can barely get to the email I have now. I do >> appreciate your doing the job. >> Third, I don't mean you push the point but if your not using it for >> new dev what are you using? Did you branch RS for you a more specific >> purpose or have you rolled your own? RS does seem to cover most bases >> but if you have more experience with it and have come across some >> short comings I'd like to hear about it and see if a) it's a going to >> burn me later or b) if I should try and address the issue and submit a >> patch. >> Thanks >> Raif >> >> On May 15, 10:13 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am using RS in projects I am maintaining. I'm just not using it for >>> new development. I will be happy to apply any well-made patches that >>> address issues or add functionality. If they have good unit tests, >>> they are good by me. >>> >>> RS is still a great project. It simply does everything I need it to >>> do in the projects I am maintaining. I think the same is true for >>> many of its users. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Deke Kraft <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> If you and Oren aren't using RS anymore, what are you using/suggest? >>> >>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>> You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library? >>>>> That doesn't sound right. It should certainly work with NH3 criteria >>>>> if you recompile using NH3 dependency though. >>> >>>>> Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects. The same >>>>> is true of me. Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and >>>>> simply accept commits that fix issues. If you want to actively >>>>> develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you. >>> >>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use >>>>>> criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1. And as such the >>>>>> RS can be used fully in with NH3. >>>>>> It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it >>>>>> certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses >>>>>> strings, but it is not necessary. Furthermore, I don't believe you >>>>>> can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria >>>>>> stuff. It's a tough call. >>>>>> I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the >>>>>> queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it. But >>>>>> unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I >>>>>> don't see how. >>>>>> R >>> >>>>>> On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> hrumph. >>>>>>> that sucks. >>>>>>> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered. >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> 1) what is Oren doing? I presume he's still using it and I presume >>>>>>> he's using NH3 >>>>>>> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/ >>>>>>> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead >>>>>>> return an IQueryOver<T,T>. This I believe would be the private >>>>>>> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but >>>>>>> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>. >>>>>>> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more? >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Raif >>> >>>>>>> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> So I guess my questions are >>>>>>>>> 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq? >>> >>>>>>>> No >>> >>>>>>>>> 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria? >>> >>>>>>>> No >>> >>>>>>>>> 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to >>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>> NH3. >>> >>>>>>>> Needs to be refacoted to use NH3. It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000 >>> >>>>>>>>> 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will >>>>>>>>> that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge >>>>>>>>> undertaking. >>> >>>>>>>> If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much >>>>>>>> welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage. >>>>>>>> It will not be trivial >>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
