I am using RS in projects I am maintaining.  I'm just not using it for
new development.  I will be happy to apply any well-made patches that
address issues or add functionality.  If they have good unit tests,
they are good by me.

RS is still a great project.  It simply does everything I need it to
do in the projects I am maintaining.  I think the same is true for
many of its users.

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Deke Kraft <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you and Oren aren't using RS anymore, what are you using/suggest?
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library?
>> That doesn't sound right.  It should certainly work with NH3 criteria
>> if you recompile using NH3 dependency though.
>>
>> Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects.  The same
>> is true of me.  Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and
>> simply accept commits that fix issues.  If you want to actively
>> develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you.
>>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use
>> > criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1.  And as such the
>> > RS can be used fully in with NH3.
>> > It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it
>> > certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses
>> > strings, but it is not necessary.  Furthermore, I don't believe you
>> > can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria
>> > stuff.  It's a tough call.
>> > I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the
>> > queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it.  But
>> > unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I
>> > don't see how.
>> > R
>> >
>> > On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> hrumph.
>> >> that sucks.
>> >> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered.
>> >> so
>> >> 1) what is Oren doing?  I presume he's still using it and I presume
>> >> he's using NH3
>> >> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/
>> >> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead
>> >> return an IQueryOver<T,T>.  This I believe would be the private
>> >> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but
>> >> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>.
>> >> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more?
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Raif
>> >>
>> >> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > So I guess my questions are
>> >> > > 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq?
>> >>
>> >> > No
>> >>
>> >> > > 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria?
>> >>
>> >> > No
>> >>
>> >> > > 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to
>> >> > > use
>> >> > > NH3.
>> >>
>> >> > Needs to be refacoted to use NH3.  It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000
>> >>
>> >> > > 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will
>> >> > > that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge
>> >> > > undertaking.
>> >>
>> >> > If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much
>> >> > welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage.
>> >> > It will not be trivial
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Rhino Tools Dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to