Since I'm using EF in new .NET projects, I've just rolled my own. For the projects I am maintaining that use RS, it has worked fine and I am sure will continue to work fine for the lifetime of these products. Some people have reported problems with RS performance for very large userbases with lots of operations.
RS is a mature project that works well for what it does. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > First, sorry, I am recompiling with NH3 I was just under the > impression that NH3 had removed ICriteria in favor of QueryOver but > that is not the case. > Second, Thank you for the offer but I don't think I would be a good > manager for RS as I can barely get to the email I have now. I do > appreciate your doing the job. > Third, I don't mean you push the point but if your not using it for > new dev what are you using? Did you branch RS for you a more specific > purpose or have you rolled your own? RS does seem to cover most bases > but if you have more experience with it and have come across some > short comings I'd like to hear about it and see if a) it's a going to > burn me later or b) if I should try and address the issue and submit a > patch. > Thanks > Raif > > On May 15, 10:13 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am using RS in projects I am maintaining. I'm just not using it for >> new development. I will be happy to apply any well-made patches that >> address issues or add functionality. If they have good unit tests, >> they are good by me. >> >> RS is still a great project. It simply does everything I need it to >> do in the projects I am maintaining. I think the same is true for >> many of its users. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Deke Kraft <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If you and Oren aren't using RS anymore, what are you using/suggest? >> >> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library? >> >> That doesn't sound right. It should certainly work with NH3 criteria >> >> if you recompile using NH3 dependency though. >> >> >> Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects. The same >> >> is true of me. Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and >> >> simply accept commits that fix issues. If you want to actively >> >> develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you. >> >> >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use >> >> > criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1. And as such the >> >> > RS can be used fully in with NH3. >> >> > It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it >> >> > certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses >> >> > strings, but it is not necessary. Furthermore, I don't believe you >> >> > can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria >> >> > stuff. It's a tough call. >> >> > I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the >> >> > queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it. But >> >> > unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I >> >> > don't see how. >> >> > R >> >> >> > On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> hrumph. >> >> >> that sucks. >> >> >> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered. >> >> >> so >> >> >> 1) what is Oren doing? I presume he's still using it and I presume >> >> >> he's using NH3 >> >> >> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/ >> >> >> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead >> >> >> return an IQueryOver<T,T>. This I believe would be the private >> >> >> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but >> >> >> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>. >> >> >> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Raif >> >> >> >> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > > So I guess my questions are >> >> >> > > 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq? >> >> >> >> > No >> >> >> >> > > 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria? >> >> >> >> > No >> >> >> >> > > 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to >> >> >> > > use >> >> >> > > NH3. >> >> >> >> > Needs to be refacoted to use NH3. It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000 >> >> >> >> > > 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will >> >> >> > > that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge >> >> >> > > undertaking. >> >> >> >> > If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much >> >> >> > welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage. >> >> >> > It will not be trivial >> >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > [email protected]. >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> [email protected]. >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
