Rhino Security and NH are best friends forever. Breaking the NH dependency would be non-trivial as RS actually adds its domain objects into your NH config.'
RS is a great project, but at this point it would take some real commitment to move it forward to work with other ORMs. In the short-term, it would be great if someone would look at making the add permissions to query work with NHLinq On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Eswann <[email protected]> wrote: > Duh! Sorry it was late, I meant "RS". > > On Jun 1, 12:23 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> RSB and NH are totally different topics, RSB has nothing to do with data >> access. >> Assuming that you are talking about Rhino Service Bus >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Eswann <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Nathan, I'm new to RSB, just checking it out, but would it be possible >> > to take more of a provider approach so that a provider could be added >> > for NH2, NH3, NH3.1, EF, etc...? Basically so that it's easier to use >> > in a project using a specific ORM. Or is NH just to interwoven >> > through RSB to make it worth attempting that type of model? If it was >> > feasible, I'd consider taking a look. >> >> > Thanks, >> > E >> >> > On May 14, 9:45 am, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library? >> > > That doesn't sound right. It should certainly work with NH3 criteria >> > > if you recompile using NH3 dependency though. >> >> > > Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects. The same >> > > is true of me. Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and >> > > simply accept commits that fix issues. If you want to actively >> > > develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you. >> >> > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use >> > > > criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1. And as such the >> > > > RS can be used fully in with NH3. >> > > > It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it >> > > > certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses >> > > > strings, but it is not necessary. Furthermore, I don't believe you >> > > > can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria >> > > > stuff. It's a tough call. >> > > > I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the >> > > > queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it. But >> > > > unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I >> > > > don't see how. >> > > > R >> >> > > > On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> hrumph. >> > > >> that sucks. >> > > >> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered. >> > > >> so >> > > >> 1) what is Oren doing? I presume he's still using it and I presume >> > > >> he's using NH3 >> > > >> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/ >> > > >> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead >> > > >> return an IQueryOver<T,T>. This I believe would be the private >> > > >> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but >> > > >> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>. >> > > >> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more? >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> Raif >> >> > > >> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > So I guess my questions are >> > > >> > > 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq? >> >> > > >> > No >> >> > > >> > > 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria? >> >> > > >> > No >> >> > > >> > > 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to >> > use >> > > >> > > NH3. >> >> > > >> > Needs to be refacoted to use NH3. It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000 >> >> > > >> > > 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will >> > > >> > > that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge >> > > >> > > undertaking. >> >> > > >> > If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much >> > > >> > welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage. >> > > >> > It will not be trivial >> >> > > > -- >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// >> > groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
