Duh! Sorry it was late, I meant "RS". On Jun 1, 12:23 am, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > RSB and NH are totally different topics, RSB has nothing to do with data > access. > Assuming that you are talking about Rhino Service Bus > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Eswann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nathan, I'm new to RSB, just checking it out, but would it be possible > > to take more of a provider approach so that a provider could be added > > for NH2, NH3, NH3.1, EF, etc...? Basically so that it's easier to use > > in a project using a specific ORM. Or is NH just to interwoven > > through RSB to make it worth attempting that type of model? If it was > > feasible, I'd consider taking a look. > > > Thanks, > > E > > > On May 14, 9:45 am, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You can use RS with NH3 without recompiling it with the NH3 library? > > > That doesn't sound right. It should certainly work with NH3 criteria > > > if you recompile using NH3 dependency though. > > > > Oren isn't using RS any longer except in existing projects. The same > > > is true of me. Oren passed the torch of RS to me to watch over it and > > > simply accept commits that fix issues. If you want to actively > > > develop RS, I will be happy to pass the torch to you. > > > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, in looking at this further, it seems that you can actually use > > > > criteria in NH3 the same way as you would in NH2.1. And as such the > > > > RS can be used fully in with NH3. > > > > It might be nice to build the QueryOver stuff into it, in fact it > > > > certainly would because QueryOver is strongly typed and criteria uses > > > > strings, but it is not necessary. Furthermore, I don't believe you > > > > can use linq with the QueryOver stuff but you can with the ICriteria > > > > stuff. It's a tough call. > > > > I think if someone can show me that you can use linq with the > > > > queryover I would build an AuthorizationRepository that used it. But > > > > unless you can some how turn an IQueryable<T> into a QueryOver<T,T> I > > > > don't see how. > > > > R > > > > > On May 12, 4:33 pm, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> hrumph. > > > >> that sucks. > > > >> Essentially with out these features RS days are numbered. > > > >> so > > > >> 1) what is Oren doing? I presume he's still using it and I presume > > > >> he's using NH3 > > > >> 2) It would seem that the changes to make it compatible with NH3 are/ > > > >> would be to change any method that returns an ICriteria to instead > > > >> return an IQueryOver<T,T>. This I believe would be the private > > > >> GetPermissionQueryInternal methods. they would take the same args but > > > >> use the queryover to build up the IQueryOver<T,T>. > > > >> Does this sound right or would it involve a lot more? > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Raif > > > > >> On May 12, 3:14 pm, Nathan Stott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Raif <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > So I guess my questions are > > > >> > > 1) Can I use RS and NH3 and linq? > > > > >> > No > > > > >> > > 2) Can I use RS and NH3 and Criteria? > > > > >> > No > > > > >> > > 3) Can I even use RS and NH3 or does it need to be refactored to > > use > > > >> > > NH3. > > > > >> > Needs to be refacoted to use NH3. It currently uses NH 2.1.0.4000 > > > > >> > > 4) Should I look at extending the RSRepository to use linq or will > > > >> > > that kill all the level 2 cache stuff and/or is that a huge > > > >> > > undertaking. > > > > >> > If you are interested in doing this refactor, it would be much > > > >> > welcomed by RS users and may even promote a renaissance of RS usage. > > > >> > It will not be trivial > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
