Is there perhaps a case for extending the scope of the mailing list? I'm sure many of us are active with non-Rietveld methods of analysing x-ray and neutron scattering data. Perhaps the list could expand accordingly and become something like the "X-ray and Neutron Scattering mailing list"?
jools From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Hewat Sent: 10. mai 2015 23:26 To: Jonathan Wright Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: 3D powder averaging... ....... Doubtless others will respond with what is new and exciting with neutrons and PDF's, etc. (yes, that is a challenge). With the greatest respect, It is not always the new and exciting techniques that produce the best science. Certainly using imaging methods for powder diffraction is promising, but it would be brave to propose already that it will have an impact comparable to that of the Rietveld method. I hear what you say, and what has been achieved so far is quite good, but I would suggest that we wait a little before drawing conclusions. ....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]> Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
