gcogger wrote: > Just a thought - why not try re-encoding a few first manually. You > might find that any improvement is so small that it's not worth it. > > For example, using the current version of the flac encoder I ripped a > couple of albums at setting 5 (default). Then I did the same albums > again using setting 8 (max compression), which took a lot longer. The > difference in size was only 0.6%, so I just leave it on setting 5 now!
I did the same test, and found a similar result. However, with ~ 1TB of flac files, 0.6% is about 6GB so it means I can squeeze another few albums into the same space. R. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
