Listener wrote:
> Robin Bowes;273719 Wrote: 
>>
>> But music players are *not* adaptable - they all use
>> Track/Album/Artist - so if we want our music to work on such players
>> we
>> can do one of two things:
>>
>> 1. Conduct a idealogical campaign to get all makers of music players
>> to
>> change the way they treat tags so we can customise them in an
>> arbitrary
>> manner to work how we want.
>>
>> 2. Adapt how we use tags to work within the Track/Album/Artist
>> paradigm.
>>
>> I would suggest that option 2. is the only viable option.
>> [color=blue]
>> ...
>> ...
>> I didn't say there *weren't* viable alternatives; ...
>> ...
>>
>>
> 
> Read your own posts.  You made a sweeping statement and I pointed out
> exceptions.

I made a statement that is correct in the vast majority of cases. You 
pointing out one or two exceptions doesn't alter the validity of my 
statement.

> If you aren't willing to acknowledge the logic of my posts
> or even to acknowledge what you wrote, just drop it.

There *is* no logic to your posts. You're not wrong - it's just your 
viewpoint. I disagree with you.

You are obviously on the ideological side of the argument. Fine. Good 
luck to you.

> Most of the people contributing to this thread are looking for a
> practical way to make things work better for them.  We also started
> with the Artist/Album/Track hierarchy and some of us want something
> better for classical music. That's not ideology.

Of course it is. The only viable way to make classical music work with 
most players on the market today is to work within the limitations of 
the Track/Album/Artist paradigm. You may not like it, but that's the 
reality.

> You said earlier that you don't browse but search.  If you don't need
> any of this, leave it to the rest of us.  

Believe me, I'd like nothing more than a better way of handling 
classical music, but I firmly believe that stepping outside 
Track/Album/Artist is a waste of time because that excludes >99% of 
music players.

Once again, I don't think you're wrong, I just think that they only 
viable way to progress this is to adapt the existing system.

R.

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to