Phil Leigh;470389 Wrote: > Apart from 2 issues: > 1 - why test psychoacoustic algorithms with unnatural test tones? > That's rather like concluding that a hammer makes a poor screwdriver. > 2 - footnote 1 is just silly.
Hi Phil, I would never doubt your points because I admittedly don't know enough about it and I respect your knowledge. Maybe you could point me/us to another source that is just as clear, but more accurate. Are the findings wrong? Could you really use music to run a test like this? I'm not sure I know exactly what he was saying in the footnote. Howard -- Howard Passman Can I go home now? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Howard Passman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16674 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69548 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
