>don't make strawman arguments. > Don't tell me what to make. >SBS simply >isn't MEANT to be, nor can it if it doesn't edit or source tags, its >virtually impossible. sbs isn't even a pimple on the ass of a flea >insofar as setting a standard for the marketplace, and thats the reality >now, and for the forseeable future, regardless of who likes it or not. > SBS doesn't need to set tags, if other apps do it adequately. And there are apps that do it adequately. It's not like SBS is inventing tags that can't be set by anything. I think you're missing the point. Not to worry.
>sbs itself confirms this; it has "itunes integration" - itunes doesn't >have sbs integration / sbs conforms to allow TPE2 to be album artist - >it didn't convince ANY app or group to not use TPE2 as AA. why is this? SBS has better than average music library management. The more people that discover that, the more people will request other apps to support those features too. Apple don't do anything to support other apps. Just like people request functions in SBS that they can see in other apps - it works both ways. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
