Sean Landis wrote: > I think a quick release (as a sign of life) might be a good idea. If a > few bug fixes can be integrated in a short time frame that would be > great. By quick release, I think less than a month after the code is > available to the committers. >
And if it's more than a month? Are you then thinking "to hell with it, might as well add some other stuff as well if it takes that long"? > I confess I haven't looked at the bug reports so I am not going to > comment on which should be in, but if fixes are already available for > some as Mark says, then they seem like good candidates. > > Moving the interfaces. utilities, and services to 1.5 is very > important to me and I'd like to see that on the roadmap in the not too Why is it important to you? > distant future. At some point, it would then make sense to integrate > some of the 1.5 features internally but, again, I'd leave that to > people more involved in the code than I. > > Not being a committer, I hope my input is not offensive to those who > are investing their personal time. > It isn't and if it is, I'm sure you'll be told :) > Regards, > Sean >
