Hi Dan,
On 5/23/07, Dan Creswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sean Landis wrote:
> I think a quick release (as a sign of life) might be a good idea. If a
> few bug fixes can be integrated in a short time frame that would be
> great. By quick release, I think less than a month after the code is
> available to the committers.
>
And if it's more than a month? Are you then thinking "to hell with it,
might as well add some other stuff as well if it takes that long"?
No the opposite. If it's more than a month, scale down. I personally
would also be happy with the idea of a baseline River release that's
essentially the current release. I was trying to find a medium ground
by supporting moderate work if it was quick.
> I confess I haven't looked at the bug reports so I am not going to
> comment on which should be in, but if fixes are already available for
> some as Mark says, then they seem like good candidates.
>
> Moving the interfaces. utilities, and services to 1.5 is very
> important to me and I'd like to see that on the roadmap in the not too
Why is it important to you?
See my response to Bob who asked the same question.
> distant future. At some point, it would then make sense to integrate
> some of the 1.5 features internally but, again, I'd leave that to
> people more involved in the code than I.
>
> Not being a committer, I hope my input is not offensive to those who
> are investing their personal time.
>
It isn't and if it is, I'm sure you'll be told :)
> Regards,
> Sean
