Hi Massimo Test suite works for prefork, but just for the fun of it, I checked with the worker (and event) mpms, as you mentioned that the worker bridge was improved. The test suite fails for some tests on both other mpms. See below.
Can you quickly elaborate whether that's OK and/or what you'd expect to work and what not? Thanks for your continued support... Ronnie Prefork MPM: rivet.test: Total 83 Passed 83 Skipped 0 Failed 0 Worker MPM: ==== headers-1.1 load_headers test FAILED ==== include-1.1 Include command FAILED ==== broken-1.1 error page test FAILED ==== config-1.2 ErrorScript config test FAILED ==== vhost-5.1 vhost with ChildInitScript FAILED ==== vhost-6.2 vhost with BeforeScript and SeparateVirtualInterps FAILED ==== inspect-1.1 basic introspection FAILED ==== bailout-3.3 ::rivet::try handling continue return code FAILED ==== bailout-3.5 ::rivet::try handling ::rivet::exit FAILED rivet.test: Total 83 Passed 74 Skipped 0 Failed 9 Event MPM: ==== postvariables-1.1 POST variables FAILED ==== postvariables-2.1 POST variables + I18N FAILED ==== postvariables-2.2 POST variables + I18N + encoding FAILED ==== postvariables-3.1 POST multi-value variable FAILED ==== postvariables-3.2 POST multi-value variable as list FAILED ==== postvariables-4.1 var_post FAILED ==== makeurl-1.1 makeurl FAILED ==== makeurl-1.2 makeurl FAILED ==== makeurl-1.3 makeurl FAILED ==== broken-1.1 error page test FAILED ==== config-auto-2.1 config test FAILED ==== config-auto-9.1 config test FAILED ==== vhost-5.1 vhost with ChildInitScript FAILED ==== vhost-6.1 vhost with ChildInitScript and SeparateVirtualInterps FAILED ==== vhost-6.3 vhost with AfterScript and SeparateVirtualInterps FAILED ==== bailout-2.2 ::rivet::catch command abort_page handling FAILED ==== bailout-3.0 ::rivet::try successful procedure call FAILED rivet.test: Total 83 Passed 66 Skipped 0 Failed 17 -- We innovate. You win. http://netcetera.com Ronnie Brunner | ronnie.brun...@netcetera.com | T +41 44 297 59 79 | Netcetera AG | 8040 Zürich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com | -----Original Message----- From: Massimo Manghi [mailto:massimo.man...@alice.it] Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 00:43 To: rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org Subject: Rivet 3.0.1 I just uploaded at http://www.rivetweb.org/~mxm/rivet/ a 3.0.1rc1 artifact for your evaluation. Basically, differences from 3.0.0 are + applied patch provided by George Petasis that correctly initializes interpreters in the worker bridge + Documentation amended and expanded in various sections I think we can proceed to vote within a few days, since differences are crucial but point like -- Massimo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscr...@tcl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-h...@tcl.apache.org
