No.. I've not heard of DSL coming out to Johnson Lane yet. Overall, I've been VERY happy with Charter... it works fine most of the time.. I've probably not had more than 20hours TOTAL of down time in 2 years. I'm just afraid that one of these days, it will go down on a Wednesday night, and they'll say "see you next Tuesday", and it will be down all that time... That's why I was chasing after an SLA.. Unfortunately, I'm on a shoestring budget..
- jim On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:30:14 -0800 "Robinson, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, I just spoke with the local rep for Charter's commercial sales. > He said on business class service, their goal is 2-4 hour response time, > but they guarantee to fix it within 24 hours. He said the response times > you were seeing before is because you are on residential service. > > By the way, you're in Verizon territory, right? I heard they were > putting in DSL soon. Have you heard anything similar? > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Washer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 5:04 PM > To: R. Busch > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RLUG] Did someone post about having charter "business" > cable modem access? > > Aha... what I'm really after is what the SLAs (service level agreements) > are. I'm tired of having the cable modem go down, and hearing, we can > come out next wednesday.. > > Granted, I don't have trouble often, but when I do, I'd like to have > them respond in a reasonable time frame. > > Do you have any experience with their response times? > > - jim > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:44:11 -0800 (PST) > "R. Busch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, James Washer wrote: > > > > James - > > > > > I seem to remember someone posting about have a 'business' account > with > > > charter, with multiple (possibly static ) ip addresses, good > bandwidth, etc.. > > > If that was you, please write me. > > > > that was me, however, I never said "good bandwidth" > > It's 768/256 kbit/sec and 3 dynamic ip's (which I > > needed for some development) > > > > And since I had 1500/128 before I'm considering > > going back, especially since static ip's would > > be way more expensive. > > > > Rainer > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > RLUG mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > > > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > > > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is intended solely for the above-mentioned recipient and it > may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received it in > error, please notify us immediately at 775-885-2211 and delete the e-mail. You must > not copy, distribute, disclose or take any action in reliance on it. > > This e-mail message and any attached files have been scanned for the presence of > computer viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own > risk. > > > > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is intended solely for the above-mentioned recipient and it > may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received it in > error, please notify us immediately at 775-885-2211 and delete the e-mail. You must > not copy, distribute, disclose or take any action in reliance on it. > > This e-mail message and any attached files have been scanned for the presence of > computer viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own > risk. > > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
