> The main reason for having a PI is the *portability*.
Portability? In user examples I've seen, most schema location URIs are
either at well-known network locations, e.g., web-xml, or file: URIs
that aren't the least bit portable.
> Also the external association cannot handle for instance
> cases when a user wants to specify that a document should be associated
> with a lite version of the main schema.
Why not?
> Tools will always have the possibility to provide a "Validate with..."
> action and allow the user to specify the schema externally, or to use
> the external association rules.
Exactly, so the PI isn't needed.
Bob Foster
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "rng-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
