B. Tommie Usdin wrote: > At 9:58 PM +0200 7/3/05, Jirka Kosek wrote: >> If you write QA tool you will simple ignore this PI and use other >> mean for specifying schema. Where is problem? > > The problem is that non-technical standards-imposers will designate > such tools as non-compliant.
I highly doubt that. Non-tech standard imposers will say "use XML" or "use Web Services", but I very strongly doubt any will ever say "use the schema processing instruction, or else...". If you know it exists, you're technical. > That is why making "convenience standards" (those that help one type > of user in one situation) and expecting that they will be ignored when > they aren't applicable is harmful to the community. I think you're exaggerating. I'm not at all a big fan of associating a schema with an instance, even if just as a hint, but a) it's sometimes useful and b) people want to do it so you won't stop them. All we can do is help make whatever standard may emerge here as harmless as possible. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
