Gregor Schneider wrote: > Actually I'm surprised we don't see a big controversial discussion around > this idea like everyone expected.
Maybe because we already had this one in July: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011896.html As I'm not a Win32k dev, I shouldn't argue about technical details. But I still don't believe that all the points expressed in e.g. http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011933.html are suddenly invalid, so that we can easily say that Arwinss is "the better architecture". For me, it looks like the slides want to give this impression. Of course, I also want to see ReactOS going forward and Arwinss can surely help for now. But simply accepting it as our new official Win32k architecture.... I don't think we can make it that easy after all previous opinions. Best regards, Colin _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
