The same thing with the kernel, we can use Linux instead! Create a distribution with it and call it Lindows! Oh wait! That ship has set sail and moved on~!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Sir Gallantmon <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't see any real reason for maintaining both branches of win32 > subsystem. Arwinss still aims to be driver compatible, right? So, what do we > gain by fully replicating the Win32 subsystem as Microsoft Windows does it? > The idea of using Wine code to further the levels of compatibility in > ReactOS is a good idea, and it has potential to make ReactOS a good choice > for "thin-client" and terminal server systems because of the X11 driver. I > personally prefer X11 SSH tunneling over VNC/RDP, because I don't need to > see the entire remote desktop, just the applications I want to run from > there. Additionally, Linux distros might include ReactOS and use their > virtualization solutions to integrate apps installed to ReactOS into the > overall Linux desktop. Nobody would ever really see the ReactOS desktop, but > ReactOS would ensure more complete compatibility with Windows apps and > games. > I think Arwinss should be the new official win32 subsystem, but meh... No _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
