On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Colin Finck <m...@colinfinck.de> wrote:
> > Maybe because we already had this one in July: > http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011896.html > > As I'm not a Win32k dev, I shouldn't argue about technical details. But I > still don't believe that all the points expressed in e.g. > http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011933.html are > suddenly > invalid, so that we can easily say that Arwinss is "the better > architecture". For me, it looks like the slides want to give this > impression. > > Of course, I also want to see ReactOS going forward and Arwinss can surely > help for now. But simply accepting it as our new official Win32k > architecture.... I don't think we can make it that easy after all previous > opinions. > I agree with Colin on this. I think arwinss is a great idea, but I still see it as a temporary solution until the real win32 subsystem can match it. Ged
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
