On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Colin Finck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Maybe because we already had this one in July: >> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011896.html >> >> As I'm not a Win32k dev, I shouldn't argue about technical details. But I >> still don't believe that all the points expressed in e.g. >> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011933.html are >> suddenly >> invalid, so that we can easily say that Arwinss is "the better >> architecture". For me, it looks like the slides want to give this >> impression. >> >> Of course, I also want to see ReactOS going forward and Arwinss can surely >> help for now. But simply accepting it as our new official Win32k >> architecture.... I don't think we can make it that easy after all previous >> opinions. >> > > I agree with Colin on this. > I think arwinss is a great idea, but I still see it as a temporary solution > until the real win32 subsystem can match it. > > Ged > > I don't see any real reason for maintaining both branches of win32 subsystem. Arwinss still aims to be driver compatible, right? So, what do we gain by fully replicating the Win32 subsystem as Microsoft Windows does it? The idea of using Wine code to further the levels of compatibility in ReactOS is a good idea, and it has potential to make ReactOS a good choice for "thin-client" and terminal server systems because of the X11 driver. I personally prefer X11 SSH tunneling over VNC/RDP, because I don't need to see the entire remote desktop, just the applications I want to run from there. Additionally, Linux distros might include ReactOS and use their virtualization solutions to integrate apps installed to ReactOS into the overall Linux desktop. Nobody would ever really see the ReactOS desktop, but ReactOS would ensure more complete compatibility with Windows apps and games. I think Arwinss should be the new official win32 subsystem, but meh...
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
