I blame andrewweb. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aleksey Bragin <alek...@reactos.org>wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Ged Murphy wrote: > > > James Tabor wrote: > > > >>> Although Jim likes the hyperbole, he is right. Arwinss is a stop gap > >>> solution that should eventually be deprecated except for the X11 > >>> module and used as a basis for verifying the 'correct' win32 > >>> subsystem. > >> > >> I'm for both! One will not replace the other... I have no idea how > >> that got started! Amazing! > >> > >> Posted this before! > > > > I'll show how this got started... > > http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php? > > title=Arwinss&diff=27579&oldid=27578 > > It was news to me too.... > I wrote that after seeing this: > http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php? > title=Arwinss&diff=27396&oldid=27018 > and similar changes there done when I was away. > > As every piece of software, Arwinss (Wine32) is a stopgap between > v1.0 and v3.0. When something better evolves, surely we'll use it. > > > WBR, > Aleksey Bragin. > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
