On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Ged Murphy wrote: > James Tabor wrote: > >>> Although Jim likes the hyperbole, he is right. Arwinss is a stop gap >>> solution that should eventually be deprecated except for the X11 >>> module and used as a basis for verifying the 'correct' win32 >>> subsystem. >> >> I'm for both! One will not replace the other... I have no idea how >> that got started! Amazing! >> >> Posted this before! > > I'll show how this got started... > http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php? > title=Arwinss&diff=27579&oldid=27578 > It was news to me too.... I wrote that after seeing this: http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php? title=Arwinss&diff=27396&oldid=27018 and similar changes there done when I was away.
As every piece of software, Arwinss (Wine32) is a stopgap between v1.0 and v3.0. When something better evolves, surely we'll use it. WBR, Aleksey Bragin. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
