James Tabor wrote: > > Although Jim likes the hyperbole, he is right. Arwinss is a stop gap > > solution that should eventually be deprecated except for the X11 > > module and used as a basis for verifying the 'correct' win32 > > subsystem. > > I'm for both! One will not replace the other... I have no idea how > that got started! Amazing! > > Posted this before!
I'll show how this got started... http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php?title=Arwinss&diff=27579&oldid=27578 It was news to me too.... Ged. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
