Richard Bown wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 2:57 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: >> 2. Exactly what problem you're trying to solve, and: >> >> a. Why it can't be solved in any other way, such as by sticking >> processEvents calls in apposite places (e.g. last thing in >> RosegardenGUIApp::initView). > > This isn't about processing events - this is about the tearing down and > rebuilding the whole of the view (i.e the parameter boxes, the segment > canvas, the rulers, the trackbuttons etc) every time we set a new > document.
No, it's "about" solving some problem. I don't give a crap whether everything's torn down and rebuilt every time we set a new document, unless that causes a problem that can't be solved except by changing the code so it doesn't do that. I'm not persuaded of that, and you evidently aren't either, or else you'd be able to explain why. > You have your (anal retentive) methods and I have mine. So what you're saying is, you want help but you also want us to shut up and let you get on with some vague shit you're not going to bother justifying. And given our past experiences with breakage when pissing about with document structure, it does need justifying. Great work, Mr Quality. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
