On Wednesday 08 Oct 2003 2:36 am, Silvan wrote: > My Lilypond advisor suggests that the correct course is to update > for 2.0 and force users to upgrade to 2.0, FWIW. In his opinion, > that's what the Lilypond community would expect. > > What I worry about are people who want to use this, but who aren't > really part of the Lilypond community. I'm a prime example of > such.
Yes, so am I. I still have 1.6 on one machine, and I've upgraded the other to 1.7.20 because I wanted to test it but without that incentive it would probably have 1.6 as well. Since the Lilypond guys don't distribute packages for SuSE and Lilypond is not especially easy to build (with the dependencies on recent versions of things like guile and mftrace), it's unlikely that I would ever upgrade from the version SuSE distribute unless I had plenty of time and a very pressing reason to. I suggest we continue to target 1.8 for now. Let's worry about 2.0 when we find it actually included on a distro somewhere. Meanwhile: Rich and I are going to be at the Linux Expo in London's Olympia 2 exhibition centre today and tomorrow. Don't expect much email. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
