On Friday 10 Oct 2003 9:45 pm, Silvan wrote: > (Forgive me if you already hacked up this code to try to work > around the above problem. I know you did some stuff a bit ago, and > I never got around to looking at what you did.)
I didn't "hack it up". I rewrote the loop structure it so that it wrote the articulations in strictly the right places. > Unless I don't recognize > the code when I get back in there. :) You might well not -- the bulk of my changes were structural rather than detail, so things might not be where you expect. Still, you'll surely recognise enough to see that it's not going to be too hard to bring the articulations down to the bottom of the loop just as you'd planned. It's just that it won't actually gain us anything, because we don't have that start/end articulation race condition any more anyway. It's an extra load of effort to support an arbitrary change to a file format, that's all. (But hang on a minute -- weren't _some_ articulations postfix already? ISTR that to do a slur between two consecutive notes, you write the first note, then ( ), then the second. So the open-slur is postfix. If I'm remembering that right, then the new scheme is surely an improvement in syntax. It's just a pain for us.) Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
