On Thursday 10 Feb 2005 17:40, Toni Arnold wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Februar 2005 16.58 schrieb Chris Cannam: > > The first release candidate for 1.0 is now available. > > Just sucessfully compiled it on a x86 gentoo box. It seems to be > working except that duplex audio thing, which is No 1 on my wishlist. > I sent the debug output directly to Chris.
Checking it over, it looks like the same symptom as the other two traces I've received. Try the fix I committed to CVS an hour or so ago and let me know how it looks. > > it will be renamed to 1.0 and released. > > The filename as it is for the rc1 does not fit well with the 0.9.x > releases: > rosegarden-4-0.9.91.tar.gz > rosegarden-4-1.0rc1.tar.bz2 Well, I can't claim to understand why 0.9.91 was called 0.9.91 in the first place. I probably will continue to use bz2 in place of gz though (or else upload both, as we did for 0.9.91). And I actively prefer 1.0 to 1.0.0 -- is there any real practical reason why that would be a problem, or just a question of aesthetics? Chris ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
