On Sunday 07 September 2008, Julie S wrote: > I ran into this problem in the mechanised stage. I casted naively to the > 64 bit (qint64) or (quint64). > > I asked about the prudence of this a couple days ago, but now it appears we > needed a definite answer.
I remember something about the discussion, but I can't find it. I can't find any references to qint64 (or qint32) or quint64 and so on in the code either. Or any sizeof\(.*int\) for that matter, except for something in MappedEvent it looks like Rich commented out 80,000 years ago, and some SEQUENCER_DATABLOCK stuff. I'm stumped trying to figure out what this is all about. Anyway, I think we want to use MAX_INT for this kind of thing, though I've had a surprisingly hard time confirming that with Google. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
