On 01/09/2017 08:38 PM, Ted Felix wrote:

>    I wasn't sure whether to add "Rosegarden::" to the front of the
> context string.  It can easily be added if its useful.  Since
> everything's in that namespace, it seemed redundant to me at the time.

I was thinking more along the lines of I wonder if it's worth rewriting 
half the universe to get control over the translation context.  It's 
almost tempting.  Almost.  Not quite though.

That worked out pretty well.  It's cleaner, without the redundancy or 
globbing even more strings into the gigantic QObject context, but 
switching everything around would be complex.  There must be some way to 
get control of all that context nonsense without having to 
QCoreApplication::translate() everywhere, but maybe there isn't.  We 
definitely wouldn't want to make future developers do that much work. 
It's hard enough to get anybody to make strings translate as it is.  I 
have to go back and fix a lot of things.  Especially from the more minor 
contributors.

Just the prattling of a man up too early from much too little sleep, 
facing another 14 hour day.

-- 
D. Michael McIntyre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to