Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsut...@gmail.com> writes: > I've often stated that I'd be happy for rosegarden 'not to make sound' > in itself and 'just' be the best Linux sequencer ;-) _but_ ... then it > means it should also provide flexible and versatile inter-operability > and communication with the ecosystem. > imho, as a noob to all this, i like this unix-like concept of one tool to do one job really well. other programs or even add-ons of various sorts (plugins?) can then manage the inter-operability.
basslint at linuxmusicians wrote: "Rosegarden does not try to be a DAW, sadly. If they did, they would implement LV2 at the very least" https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?p=134239#p134239 i was very sad about this too, until my noob awareness revealed to me that i didn't really know what a daw was in the first place! i also read in many places that the entire linux music scenario was a bit chaotic. may be that's because too many try to do too much too often. for me, a few simple tools put together to do complex tasks works better than one complex tool to do everything assuming i get around to figuring it out. right now, thx to the excellent guidance on this elist, i'm settled on: 1. rg as my sequencer (and notation producer -> refined editing with emacs) 2. yoshimi to generate sounds (instead of plugins|fluidsynth|timidity) 3. audacity to record vocals then put into rg conceptually i find this manageable instead of trying to do everything in rg. practically ... well we'll find out this week! -- In friendship, prad _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
