All,
I'd like to probe for consensus on 2 general statements,
which are listed below.
NOTE WELL:
1) This is a personal note, so results are neither official
nor binding on anyone.
2) Edits, corrections, and discussion are all out-of-scope.
(The RG Chairs might choose to hold an official poll later,
on this or some other set of statements; that choice is theirs.)
3) This is a call for an up/down unofficial & non-binding straw poll.
- "Yes" to a statement means "I agree this is approximately true"
- "No" to a statement means "I think this is entirely 100% wrong."
For now, "waffle" votes of the form that this is partly true and
partly wrong just aren't helpful.
STATEMENTS & BALLOT:
A) "The Internet continuing down the current architectural path,
whereby site multi-homing increases the size/entropy of the
DFZ RIB/FIB is not believed to be scalable or viable."
[ ] YES
[ ] NO
B) "There is no reason to believe that a scalable solution for
site multi-homing will appear in the future so long as the
Internet proceeds with current architectural approach to
site multi-homing."
[ ] YES
[ ] NO
Yours,
Ran
PS:
(I believe both A and B are approximately true, of course.)
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
