Pekka Savola allegedly wrote on 03/11/2010 08:52 EST: > FWIW, yes, it certainly was ambiguous, but it was apparent that lots of > folks interpreted it their own way.
I never got around to responding because of the ambiguities. Also I don't see how it really matters. If it means what I think it means, it's a truism. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
